Compare Products: 345 Relief Cream vs NAD+ Peptide Boosting Serum
Who It's Designed For
- Those with compromised or sensitized skin barriers
- Users recovering from skin procedures or environmental damage
- Sensitive skin types seeking a fragrance-free calming cream
- People who want centella benefits with added antioxidant support
- Those looking for a non-greasy barrier repair cream
- Those concerned with early signs of aging and fine lines
- Users interested in peptide-based anti-aging without retinoids
- Sensitive skin types seeking a fragrance-free anti-aging serum
- People looking for NAD+ based skincare for cellular renewal
- Those who want barrier support alongside anti-aging actives
Key Ingredients
Centella Asiatica Extract, Resveratrol, Ceramide NP, Panthenol, Madecassoside
NAD+ (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide), NMN (Nicotinamide Mononucleotide), 14 Peptide Complex, 5 Ceramides, Vegan Collagen
Product Composition
40% similarity (23 ingredients in common)
Only in Dr. Althea (14)▾
Only in EQQUALBERRY (20)▾
User Feedback Patterns
Users frequently report reduced redness and calmer skin within days of use. Popular among those with rosacea-prone or post-procedure skin.
Multiple reviewers note the texture is lighter than expected for a repair cream. Absorbs well and works under makeup.
Many users report using this as their primary moisturizer long-term, not just for recovery periods. Consistent performance across seasons.
Some users with significantly compromised barriers note the cream helped but was not sufficient on its own. Needed pairing with other barrier products.
Multiple reviewers note the serum feels very thin and watery. Some appreciate the lightness for layering; others feel it lacks substance on its own.
Users who report positive outcomes typically note improvements in skin hydration and firmness after 1 to 4 weeks of consistent use.
Several users complain that the dropper releases very small amounts, making application tedious for face and neck coverage.
Positive reviews praise hydration and glow. Negative reviews report feeling no difference, questioning whether the NAD+ and peptides deliver visible results at the concentrations used.